Comments for Commavee http://commavee.com Written by John Minnihan, founder of Freepository. I write about software, automation and anything else that interests me. Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:11:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 Comment on 017_17 by Buy tadalis. http://commavee.com/2005/07/02/017_17/#comment-27340 Buy tadalis. Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:48:08 +0000 /?p=67#comment-27340 <strong>Buy tadalis....</strong> Buy tadalis.... Buy tadalis….

Buy tadalis….

]]> Comment on Convert Nordictrack revolutions to miles by michelle http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-24930 michelle Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:41:58 +0000 http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-24930 I would tend to agree with your calculations vs. the company. I generally get around 3000 revolutions in just over an hour. There is no way I have gone ten miles in that time. I also have a 990. I felt that for a thousand dollar machine I should be able to get a clear answer from the company. Thank you for your help. I would tend to agree with your calculations vs. the company. I generally get around 3000 revolutions in just over an hour. There is no way I have gone ten miles in that time. I also have a 990. I felt that for a thousand dollar machine I should be able to get a clear answer from the company. Thank you for your help.

]]> Comment on Convert Nordictrack revolutions to miles by John Minnihan http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-23972 John Minnihan Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:24:05 +0000 http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-23972 Thanks for commenting here. This is certainly an interesting topic. It would seem that the company & I are either using different definitions for 'revolution' or they are factoring in/out something I'm not considering. In my case, I'm comfortable w/ my calcs. I measured my trainer & did the math. It's all theory, though, since the trainer is never going to actually travel anywhere. Thanks for commenting here. This is certainly an interesting topic.

It would seem that the company & I are either using different definitions for ‘revolution’ or they are factoring in/out something I’m not considering.

In my case, I’m comfortable w/ my calcs. I measured my trainer & did the math. It’s all theory, though, since the trainer is never going to actually travel anywhere.

]]> Comment on Convert Nordictrack revolutions to miles by Anonymous http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-23969 Anonymous Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:09:33 +0000 http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-23969 I was looking up this recently, and tried the service department, they confirmed the 300 revolutions = 1 mile number. Or referencing the chart, 1500 revolutions was 5 miles. It doesn't sound like enough, but they checked twice. This was with an audiostrider 990 I was looking up this recently, and tried the service department, they confirmed the 300 revolutions = 1 mile number. Or referencing the chart, 1500 revolutions was 5 miles.

It doesn’t sound like enough, but they checked twice.

This was with an audiostrider 990

]]> Comment on Convert Nordictrack revolutions to miles by John Minnihan http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-23520 John Minnihan Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:19:22 +0000 http://commavee.com/2008/01/13/convert-nordictrack-revolutions-to-miles/#comment-23520 The wheel - where the energy is delivered & converted to work (rotations) - is circular. Expressed that way, one can state that n rotations of the wheel is equivalent to x mile[s] in *theoretical* travel. The assumption here, of course, is that the machine & I are defining 'revolution' the same way. Since the wheel is the only part of the machine that actually revolves, I'm using 'revolution' to refer to a full circle rotation of it. The line that the wheel would traverse when rotated (if free to "roll") is fixed & independent of other factors (assuming no slippage/excess friction etc.). The wheel - where the energy is delivered & converted to work (rotations) - is circular. Expressed that way, one can state that n rotations of the wheel is equivalent to x mile[s] in *theoretical* travel.

The assumption here, of course, is that the machine & I are defining ‘revolution’ the same way. Since the wheel is the only part of the machine that actually revolves, I’m using ‘revolution’ to refer to a full circle rotation of it.

The line that the wheel would traverse when rotated (if free to “roll”) is fixed & independent of other factors (assuming no slippage/excess friction etc.).

]]>